Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Tantemsapya

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 2018No. COA17-281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*466The Caveators appeal from the trial court's order dismissing their will caveat under North Carolina Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Because the alleged codicil upon which the caveat was based is not a valid holographic codicil on its face, we affirm.

I. Background

On 26 July 2016, Amy Hendrix Weber and Maureen Traverse Collins, caveators, filed a caveat to the will of Marguerite Traverse Hendrix dated 1 September 2011 ("2011 Will"). The Caveators are two of about twelve named beneficiaries under the 2011 Will. Ms. Hendrix died on 7 June 2016, and her will entered probate on 24…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgin v. OwenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. In Re the Will of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In Re the Will of MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. of EverhartColorado Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API