Legal Opinion

Moon v. Allen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1900No. Nos. 12,319—(160)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The complaint in substance alleges: That for several years prior to May 29, 1894, plaintiff and defendant were co-partners under the firm name of Allen, Moon & Co., at St. Paul, and were engaged in general wholesale grocery business; that during that term, by agreement, plaintiff had charge of the credits and collection of accounts; that in the collection and adjustment of doubtful accounts plaintiff frequently took property in his own name for the benefit of the firm, and was frequently appointed receiver or assignee in case of insolvency of the firm’s debtors, but in such cases was acting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Carlson v. Presbyterian Board of ReliefSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Price v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Lund v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGilvery v. McGilvery & Seeley, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. On RehearingIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API