Legal Opinion
John Wanamaker v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. Nos. 4842, 4843PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
These are petitions to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining in part, and disallowing in part, proposed additional income and excess profits taxes for the years 1916 to 1920, inclusive. The management of the two department store corporations, John Wanamaker, Philadelphia, and Jolm Wanamaker, New York, filed consolidated returns for these years, with the exception of the year 1916. The petition for review on behalf of John Wanamaker, New York, for 1916 has been taken to the Second Circuit and is not involved in this proceeding.
The pertinent facts are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Willcuts v. GradwohlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrew Crispo Gallery, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc. v. The United States. John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc. (Successor by Merger to John Wanamaker New York, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- John Wanamaker Philadlephia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Broad Motors Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Davenport Machine & Foundry Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.