Legal Opinion

Reinecke v. Spalding

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1930No. 59PublishedCited by 202 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The respondent owns a one-sixth interest in several leases executed 1901, 1902, 1903, and 1905, which authorize the lessee to take iron ore from certain Minnesota lands for twenty-five, forty-five and fifty years from their respective dates. These leases require payments quarterly of 25 cents royalty per ton upon all ore extracted; provide for minimum annual production and termination under specified circumstances.

During the year 1917 she received out of such royalties $260,072.30; during 1918, $219,940.43. For 1917 she was allowed $99,561.20 as depletion; for 1918, $84,979.55. Income tax was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. W. Horace Williams, Sr., and Viola Bloch Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. B. B. Carter and Mrs. Tommie v. Carter v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Sutherland v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API