State v. G.L.D.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] G.L.D. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual after the court found he remains a sexually dangerous individual. G.L.D. argues the district court erred in deciding the State proved by clear and convincing evidence that he remains a sexually dangerous individual. We hold the court’s finding that G.L.D. remains a sexually dangerous individual is not clearly erroneous, and we affirm the order.
I
[IT 2] G.L.D. was incarcerated in 1996 after a conviction for gross sexual imposi*348tion. As his release…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Alumni Ass'n of University v. Hart Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Matter of R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Burdick v. R.A.S. (In re R.A.S.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.