Legal Opinion

State v. G.L.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2011No. 20100230PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] G.L.D. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual after the court found he remains a sexually dangerous individual. G.L.D. argues the district court erred in deciding the State proved by clear and convincing evidence that he remains a sexually dangerous individual. We hold the court’s finding that G.L.D. remains a sexually dangerous individual is not clearly erroneous, and we affirm the order.

I

[IT 2] G.L.D. was incarcerated in 1996 after a conviction for gross sexual imposi*348tion. As his release…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Alumni Ass'n of University v. Hart Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Matter of R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Burdick v. R.A.S. (In re R.A.S.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API