Legal Opinion

Rynear Co. v. Evans

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 12, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This was a suit in equity by the Kynear Company against George Evans for alleged infringement of a patent for artificial metal tooth crowns or caps. Final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an equity suit for the infringement of letters patent No. 305,238, granted to Moses Kynear, September 16, 1884, for an artificial metal tooth-crown cap. The specification states that prior to the alleged invention metallic tooth crowns had been constructed by fitting a band around each root'at its upper end. After being fitted to the contour of the root the-band was removed and soldered, forming a ring. The top or grinding surface of the tooth was subsequently soldered to the ring. After pointing out tbe disadvantages of this mode of procedure the patentee states…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Consolidated Electric Manuf'g Co. v. HoltzerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
  5. Kilbourne v. W. Pingham Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Radio Corporation of America v. EJ Edmond & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  4. Health Products Corporation v. Ex-Lax Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Wilson Remover Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API