Armstrong v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Shenandoah Superior Court. — Frederick Fisci-ier, Judge. Proceeding in garnishment. Garnishee appeals from a judgment against him.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.-
l. garnishment: ^•^conting’ent «ability. I. This is an appeal by John W. Shunick, garnishee, from a judgment entered against him in the superior court of the city of Shenandoah, on March 21, 1922, as the supposed debtor of Jerome B. Armstrong, Sr., the principal defendant in an action brought in said court against him by Florence E. Armstrong, administratrix of the estate of Jerome B. Armstrong, Jr., deceased', for an accounting of partnership assets.
The action was commenced April 7, 1919, and notice of garnishment was served upon Shunick on the same day. The material facts are as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schoonover v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Streeter v. GleasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Morse v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Oskaloosa Savings Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Smith, Twogood & Co. v. Clarke & HenleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Malone v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- In Re Borcherding's CustodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Stowe v. BreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941