Legal Opinion

Mazzotta v. Bornstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 12, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

Upon the original trial in the Superior Court there was found due the plaintiff $17,248.54, less certain deductions, upon which amount the court added interest in the sum of $698.52, and rendered its judgment for $14,585.89. Upon appeal this court held the amount of the judgment was correct except as to an item of $372. We thereupon set the judgment aside and remanded the case (104 Conn. 431, 133 Atl. 677), “with direction to enter judgment for the plaintiff for the amount found due him in the judgment appealed from, $14,585.89, with the addition of $372, ... in all, $14,957.89.”

The trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. McElroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Raymond v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Mazzotta v. BornsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Converse, Receiver v. Aetna National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. Valente v. OpperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API