Legal Opinion
Veno v. AT&T CORP.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 24, 2003No. CIV.A.02-10383-NGPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERTNER, District Judge.
This case is brought by Robert H. Veno (“Veno”) against AT&T Corporation (“AT&T”) for repeatedly obtaining Veno’s credit report in violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 (“FCRA”), Massachusetts’ Credit Reporting Act, G.L. c. 214 § IB (“MCRA”), and Massachusetts General Laws chapter 93A. Veno was not a customer of AT&T at the time of any of the alleged incidents.
Before the Court presently are cross-motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Myrtle Thomas v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Samuel Myers v. The Bennett Law Offices, and Doug McCallon Timothy Myers v. The Bennett Law OfficesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Carmine Casella v. Equifax Credit Information Services, and Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Pinson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Simoneaux v. BrownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2005
- Hauge v. TransUnion, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Smith v. Tenant Tracker Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2022