Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Britestarr Homes, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lewis R. Friedman, J.
Plaintiff moves to restore the notice of pendency, previously canceled by this court, on the ground that the surety is not authorized to post the undertakings which the defendants have posted.
In this action the city seeks, inter alla, an injunction (1) prohibiting the storage of certain material on defendant’s property, (2) preventing the operation of an illegal construction waste transfer station and (3) requiring removal of the waste on the grounds that its presence violates the New York City Nuisance Abatement Law (Administrative Code of City of New…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Decker v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Goodwin v. . BunzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Manning v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Stevenson v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deerman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- 3405 Putnam Realty Corp. v. Chubb Custom InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005