Legal Opinion
State v. Hileman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1998No. CA96-10-219PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Walsh, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Flora Hileman, appeals from the judgment of the Hamilton Municipal Court finding her guilty of the charge of cruelty to animals and ordering her to pay restitution to the Humane Association of Butler County.
On August 20, 1996, appellant was charged with cruelty to animals when , thirteen sick and malnourished animals were found in her care. On September 30, Í996, a pretrial hearing was held. In an entry dated October 29, 1996, following a plea of no contest, the trial court found appellant guilty and sentenced her. As part of her sentence, appellant was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TheuringOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Eastlake v. KosecOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LeslieOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. BybeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. Carr, Unpublished Decision (1-24-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. Dock, Unpublished Decision (9-26-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. Funkhouser, Unpublished Decision (2-14-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003