Binyam Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge, with whom Judges SCHROEDER, CANBY, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges,
join, dissenting:
A Flawed Procedure
I agree with my colleagues in the majority that United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 73 S.Ct. 528, 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953), is a rule of evidence, requiring courts to undertake a careful review of evidence that might support a claim or defense to determine whether either could be made without resort to legitimate state secrets. I part company concerning when and where that review should take place.
The majority dismisses the case in its entirety before…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.