State v. Gill
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahasha District Court. — Hon. W. O. Clements, Judge. The defendants were convicted of keeping a house of ill fame, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1. Criminal law: disorderly house: coercion of wife: presumption. I. The defendants were jointly indicted, and, as they are husband and wife, counsel argue that the presumption that what the latter did was by coercion of the husband, and for this, reason she should , , . i * rv have been acquitted. As to many ortenses ° committed m the 'husband s presence, such x ' is the rule. State v. Harvey, 130 Iowa, 394; State v. Kelly, 74 Iowa, 589; State v. Fitzgerald, 49 Iowa, 260. But this rule has no application to the crime of keeping a bawdyhouse or house of ill fame, “for this is an offense as to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- People v. BuchananIdaho Supreme Court · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. MauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- State v. PylesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. BurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.