Legal Opinion

Rose v. Provo City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 20, 2003No. 20010168-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

{1 Claude Theodore Rose (Rose) appeals from directed verdicts in favor of Elmer and Georgina Barrientos (collectively the Bar-rientoses) and Provo City (the City). We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND 1

{2 The Barrientoses own a restaurant in Provo City, including the parking lot next to the restaurant. The City owns a sidewalk that borders the parking lot and owns the area between the sidewalk and the street (the planter strip).

13 Before the Barrientoses purchased the restaurant, the planter strip was asphalted to the street. At trial, Elmer Barrientos testified that…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Williams v. MelbyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Steffensen v. Smith's Management Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Normandeau v. Hanson Equipment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thurston v. Workers Compensation Fund of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  3. Riggs v. Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Airstar v. Keystone AviationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Smith v. Bank of Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API