Van Kannell Revolving Door Co. v. Revolving Door & Fixture Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Van Kannell Revolving Door Company against the Revolving Door & Fixture Company. On exceptions to master's report.
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
There have been no exceptions at all, properly speaking, to the master’s report, but both sides have consented to treat the execeptions filed to the draft report as equivalent to exceptions to the report proper, and on that stipulation I shall dispose of the case.
[1] The defendant presses only exceptions II,, IV, V, and VI. Exception II goes to the question whether it was an infringement for the defendant to take away from the plaintiff a contract calling for a door covered by the patent, and later to change the structure so that it did not infringe. The exception…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Canda Bros. v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Luten v. Town of LeeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Smith v. Dental Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Le Clair v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1960
- Southern Music Publishing Co. v. C & C Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- E. F. Hauserman Co. v. Wright Metal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.