Legal Opinion
Public Utilities Commission v. Utterstrom Bros.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 12, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
On exceptions to rulings and decision of the Public Utilities Commission.
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, hereafter called by its more familiar designation, A. & P., maintains numerous retail stores throughout the State of Maine. It owns and operates a warehouse at Portland and employs several contract carriers to transport over the highways merchandise to its stores. These contract carriers are the respondents in the present case. On its own initiative, the Public Utilities Commission ordered a hearing upon the rates charged for transportation service by the respondents upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wight v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hamilton v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- Gilman v. Somerset Farmers Co-Operative Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Public Utilities Commission v. City of Lewiston Water CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
- Pennsylvania R. v. International Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- Public Utilities Commission v. Cole's ExpressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Anthony Augliera, Inc. v. LoughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Baltimore Tank Lines v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.