Legal Opinion
Darweger v. Staats
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNaught, J.
The action is for a permanent injunction against the defendants, members of Divisional Code Authority, Division No. 3, Retail Solid Fuel Industry, to restrain such defendants from, interfering with the conduct of plaintiff’s business, fixing or attempting to fix the price at which he may sell his product within the State of New York, or instituting proceedings against him for violation of Code provisions.
The plaintiff is a so-called independent equipped coal dealer in the city of Binghamton. His coal is purchased in the city of Binghamton from truckers who purchase and transport the same from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lincoln Dairy Company v. FiniganNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Smithberger v. BanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. Princeton, Inc.New York City Magistrates' Court · 1935
- de Agostina v. Parkshire Ridge Amusements, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- McDermott v. BradfordDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.