McDermott v. Bradford
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Dissent
CUSHMAN, District Judge. (dissenting).
I am unable to concur in the decision of the majority.
This suit is one under title 28 USCA § 380 to enjoin defendants from the enforcement or attempt to enforce chapter 50, p. 119, of the Laws of the Extraordinary Ses*665sion of the Washington state Legislature, 1933, known as the “Washington State Industrial Recovery Act” (Laws 1933, Ex. Sess., p. 119, Rem. Rev. Stat. of Wash., 1934 Annual Pocket Part, §§ 7657- — 1 to 7657 — 10).
The majority holds that plaintiff’s hill should be dismissed and interlocutory injunction denied because plaintiff has not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.