Legal Opinion
State v. Sonthikoummane
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 31, 2000No. 97-588PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant, Bountham Sonthikoummane, appeals his convictions, after a jury trial in Superior Court (Perkins, J.), on three indictments for conspiring to sell a controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2 (1995). The defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting and excluding certain evidence at trial. We affirm.
Based on the evidence adduced at trial, the jury could have found the following facts. In July 1996, Corporal Nightingale, an undercover narcotics detective for the State Police, led an investigation in Laconia. In the course of that investigation, Nightingale made arrangements with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Jonathan PennyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Anthony GrandisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Walter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- State v. NightingaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Bailey v. PitcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.