Legal Opinion

California Thorn Cordage, Inc. v. Diller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1932No. Docket No. 7747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey,p. J.

At the time of filing the amended complaint in this action (March 31, 1928), the defendant William Diller was a stockholder and director of plaintiff corporation, and also was a creditor of plaintiff. As such creditor he held several notes of the corporation, some of which were secured by mortgage and others were unsecured. Although Elizabeth Diller is named as a defendant, she had no part in the transactions now to be considered, and it will be convenient and sufficient to refer to William Diller as the defendant, or as the appellant, and to describe the plaintiff and respondent as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Seches v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jeffries Coal Co. v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Taliaferro v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Jeffries Coal Co. v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API