Legal Opinion

Parkview Paving Co. v. City of New Haven

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 8, 1988No. 4798PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff challenges a judgment rendered by the trial court in a breach of contract action brought by the plaintiff. The trial court found that the plaintiff, and not the defendant, breached the landscaping contract and that the plaintiff could not recover *575the value of materials and services allegedly provided. We find no error.

“An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review of such a claim is limited to a determination of whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect or otherwise contrary to law. Practice Book § 4061; Damora v. Christ-Janer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Edgewood Construction Co. v. West Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Hallmark of Farmington v. RoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Essex Savings Bank v. LeekerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Cioffoletti Construction v. NeringConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Greco v. GrecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Grimm v. GrimmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API