Legal Opinion

Kirschwing v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 1949No. 16,010PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

delivered the'opinion of the court.

This action concerns interpretation of a portion of the amendment of the charter of City and County of Denver- concerning police pensions which became effective June 1, 1947, which reads as follows:

“Retirement
“Any member of the Denver Police Department in the classified service who shall have completed twenty-five years of active service in said department, shall, upon his request, be retired from further service in said department and such member shall thereafter, during his life-time, be paid in equal monthly installments from the ‘Pension and Relief Fund’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. State Ex Rel. Sena v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Board of Trustees v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. City and County of Denver v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. McNichols v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Haines v. Colorado State Personnel Bd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API