Legal Opinion

Wofford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2002No. WD 59866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas H. Newton, J.

The State of Missouri appeals the motion court’s judgment granting Mr. Wof-ford’s Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief, which vacated his guilty plea to the charge of manufacturing methamphetamine. We reverse.

I. Factual Background

Mr. Wofford pled guilty to the charge of manufacturing a controlled substance (methamphetamine) under § 195.211 2 in the Circuit Court of Holt County, before the Honorable John C. Andrews. At the time he pled guilty, Mr. Wofford filed a petition to enter a plea of guilty in which he admitted to manufacturing and producing methamphetamine. Also, in the plea…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Hoskin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maberry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Crabtree v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Huntley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API