Legal Opinion

Jurva v. Attorney General

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1981No. Docket No. 54868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. B. Glaser, J.

Defendant Attorney General appeals from an order of the trial court granting plaintiffs summary judgment. His application for leave to appeal pursuant to GCR 1963, 852.2 was denied by the Supreme Court.

Plaintiffs Jurva and McDonald are teachers, and the Rochester Education Association is their bargaining agent. In 1974, the association and the school board entered into a collective-bargaining agreement for the 1974-1976 school years. This *597agreement contained a provision by which teachers who elected to take early retirement would receive a specific sum of money from the board. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Attorney General v. ConnollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Senghas v. L'Anse Creuse Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Singer Architectural Servs. Co. v. DoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West Ottawa Education Ass'n v. West Ottawa Public Schools Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Jurva v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Szalacinski v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. Jurva v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API