Legal Opinion
United States v. Gotchnik
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1999No. 98-262 ADM/RLE, 98-302 ADM/RLEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-entitled matters came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge pursuant to the Defendants’ Motion for the Entry of Judgment of Acquittal. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)(3); 18 U.S.C. § 3401(a) and (b). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
II. BACKGROUND
Defendants David J. Gotchnik (“Gotch-nik”) and Mark F. Steptec (“Steptec”) are members of the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians, one of the federally-recognized Indian tribes which were signatories…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. BosworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Friends Of The Boundary Waters Wilderness v. BosworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006