Carpetland of Northwest Arkansas, Inc. v. Howard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
The primary question in this product liability case concerns the defendant-manufacturers’ impleader of third-party defendants under ARCP Rule 14, and what causes of action defendants — third-party plaintiffs can maintain against third-party defendants after the original plaintiffs have dismissed their claim against the defendants.
Gary and Nancy Howard sued Carpetland of Northwest Arkansas, Inc., and Philadelphia Carpet, Inc., appellants, (Carpetland) alleging that a carpet installed in their home was defective, in that orange-pink spots had appeared on the carpet…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Watson v. Cleveland Chair Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Britton v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Mine Creek Contractors, Inc. v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Guaranty National Insurance v. Denver Roller, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Firstbank of Arkansas v. KeelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Jean-Pierre v. Plantation Homes of Crittenden County, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- FLORENCE BY MATTHEWS v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.