Legal Opinion

Sack v. Dolese

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1891PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding. Mr. Justice Moran delivered the opinion of the Appellate Court, as follows, affirming the judgment of the trial court: “Appellant was at work for appellees in a quarry, near to-which was a machine for crushing the stone.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding. Mr. Justice Moran delivered the opinion of the Appellate Court, as follows, affirming the judgment of the trial court: “Appellant was at work for appellees in a quarry, near to-which was a machine for crushing the stone. The crushed stone was run from the crusher through a spout into cars, and as each car was filled it was run out on the track and an empty one brought up under the spout. The motion given to the full car would…

1Per curiam

We have given this case a careful consider-

ation, and we are satisfied that the Appellate Court arrived at a correct conclusion, and we concur in what was said in the opinion of that court.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by51 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. East Tennessee & Western North Carolina Railroad v. LindamoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Green v. SansomSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. South Baltimore Car Works v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Chesapeake Iron Works v. Hochschield, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API