Legal Opinion

East Tennessee & Western North Carolina Railroad v. Lindamood

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 43 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County.—C. J. St. John, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

This is the second time this case has been before this court. At the September term, 1902, it was reversed because of the admission of incompetent testimony. The opinion of the court on that reversal will be found in 109 Tenn., 407, 74 S. W., 112. Upon its remand, another trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment for $5,000 against the railroad company; and it has appealed, and assigned errors upon the action of the trial judge.

The defendant in error was a brakeman in service of *460plaintiff in error, and while discharging his duty as such he received the injury, to recover damage for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Hughes v. Cincinnati, &c., RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. East Tennessee Coal Co. v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ladd v. New Bedford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hayes v. GillTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. De Glopper v. Nashville Railway & Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API