Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 12, 1984No. 67570PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Resolution of the instant appeal requires an understanding of the entire procedural history of the litigation.
Pursuant to the provisions of OCGA § 32-3-1 et seq., two condemnation actions were instituted by appellee-condemnor Department of Transportation (DOT). As to at least a portion of each parcel taken by DOT, appellant-condemnees held a leasehold interest and accordingly became defendants in the proceedings. Condemnees were dissatisfied with the amount of estimated just and adequate compen sation deposited into court by DOT, and they filed notices of appeal pursuant to OCGA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Reno v. RenoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Department of Transportation v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Johnson v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Nodvin v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McClarity v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Boyd v. Johngalt Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Smiway, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Franco's Pizza & Delicatessen, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- PATEL Et Al. v. PATELCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.