Legal Opinion

Mabry v. Conocophillips Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 6, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00039Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MONTE MABRY, Plaintiff, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS CO., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-00039-SLG Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Before the Court at Docket 57 is Plaintiff Monte Mabry’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s order at Docket 49. Defendant Alight Solutions LLC (“Alight”) responded at Docket 60, to which Plaintiff replied at Docket 63. Defendants ConocoPhillips Co. (“ConocoPhillips”) and the Benefits Committee of the ConocoPhillips Retirement Plan (“Benefits Committee”) (collectively, “ConocoPhillips Defendants”)…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API