Legal Opinion

Lyerly v. Alabama State Bar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 11, 1998No. 1970744Published

1Per curiam

Jonathan Eric Lyerly appeals from an order of the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar finding him guilty of knowingly failing to respond to a lawful demand of the State Bar Disciplinary Board for information, in violation of Rule 8.1(b), Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct. We reverse and render a judgment for Lyerly.

The original complaint in this lawyer discipline case was made against Lyerly, a lawyer practicing in Birmingham, by two of his clients. Their complaint basically related to a fee dispute. Although the State Bar dismissed the charges filed by the clients, because of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Acton v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Ex Parte ActonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. In Re CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Dodd v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API