Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Acton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 So.2d 685 (1968)

Ex parte E. Ray ACTON.

In re E. Ray ACTON

v.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the ALABAMA STATE BAR.

6 Div. 137.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 6, 1968.

On Rehearing October 10, 1968.

Prince, Jones, Fowler, Propst & Topazi, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Jas. L. North, Birmingham, Gary P. Smith, Truman Hobbs, Frank Riggs, III, Montgomery, Frances Hare, Birmingham, Guy Sparks, Jas. S. Hubbard, Anniston, and Chas. Nice, Birmingham, amici curiae in behalf of petitioner.

Lawrence K. Andrews, Gen. Counsel, Wm. H. Morrow, Jr., Montgomery, for State Bar.

Petition for Review and Stay

2Per curiam 1

Petitioner seeks…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Carnegie v. CarnegieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. In Re GorsuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Loveman v. LaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CharlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. R. C. (Buck) Marcum, the Father of Marcus Marcum, a Deceased Minor v. United States of America, U. S. Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Teng v. Diplomat National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. In Re CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Dodd v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API