Legal Opinion
In Re Carroll
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 8, 1971No. 8 Div. 403PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALL, Justice.
This is a review of a disciplinary proceeding on a petition, filed in this court by the accused attorney, hereafter called the defendant. Such is provided for under Rule 28 of Section B of the Amended Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Alabama. These rules are found in 239 Ala. XXIII et seq. as amended in 272 Ala. XXI, XXII. The charges were preferred in a written complaint filed by the Grievance Committee of the State Bar.
Initially, the complaint contained four charges. These are to the effect that the defendant, a duly licensed and practicing attorney in Huntsville,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fite v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Acton v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Garrett v. Garrett's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Ex Parte ActonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Ex Parte NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Dodd v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Rasmussen v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Tarver v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.