Feliciano v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
The trial court granted respondent’s petition for a writ of mandate after concluding that the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Gov. Code, § 20000 et seq.) required that respondent be reclassified as a “safety member” of the retirement system. Our reading of the applicable statutes leads us to the conclusion that respondent is not entitled to reclassification. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.
Facts
Respondent Robert Feliciano was employed by appellant Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (Housing Authority) as director of police and safety from June…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Boxx v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Charles v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pomona Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997