Van Dam v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, Van Dam, hereafter called respondent, and Ellison and Shaffer, were, on April 14, 1927, arrested and brought before a commissioner for examination, upon the charge of transporting and selling intoxicating liquor. While this examination was pending under adjournment, the grand jury indicted Van Dam and Ellison for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). They were both convicted. Van Dam brought this writ of error, in which Ellison did not join. Counsel say — and it is apparently a proper inference — that Ellison preferred to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Leonard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Finton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. NagleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1929
- Marco Industries, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Walls v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.