Legal Opinion

Sarasota Publishing Co. v. E. C. Palmer & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.

— In this case the suit was on a note which provided for attorney’s fees in the sum of ten per cent in the event of default in the payment of the note. In regard to this item it was alleged in the declaration as follows:

“That because of the failure of said defendant to pay said note as aforesaid, the same has been placed in the hands of an attorney for collection and suit instituted thereon; and the plaintiff claims the principal and interest on said note, together with the ten per cent attorneys fee provided for therein on- the principal and interest.”

There was no allegation in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brett v. First National Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Winchester v. HakSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. City of Boca Raton v. Boca Villas Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. City of Boca Raton v. Faith Baptist ChurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API