In re the Claim of Hooghkirk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 2, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
*903Claimant worked as a make-up artist for a photography studio. Her employment was terminated because she complained about a co-worker in the presence of customers. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that she was terminated for misconduct. Upon review of the record, we find the Board’s decision to be supported by…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Claim of JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005