Bowman v. Western Fur Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Polk District Court. — Hon. S. F. Balliet, Judge. Action at law to recover tbe value of a mink dolman. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the Court
Robinson J.
During tbe latter part of tbe year 1891 tbe defendant H. J. Gutman was doing business in Des Moines under tbe name of “Western Fur Manufacturing Company.” Both he and tbe company are named as parties defendant. In October, 1891, tbe plaintiff delivered to tbe defendants for keeping and sale a mink dolman, a mink cap, and a mink muff. About tbe middle of the next month tbe dolman disappeared' and neither that nor tbe other articles were produced on tbe demand of tbe plaintiff. This action was commenced to recover the value of all of tbe articles, but some time after it was commenced…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Langworthy v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- State v. HeathertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Perry v. CottinghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Forney v. RemeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Miller v. RootSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Skinner v. CronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Elmore v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Freels v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Foedisch v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.