Legal Opinion
Lambert v. Lagow
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1825PublishedCited by 5 opinions
APPEAL from the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Debt against Lambert upon the following ob*389ligation: “On or before the 1st Sept. 1823, I promise to pay Wilson Lagow or order 425 dollars, &c. Witness my hand and .seal this 7th Dec. 1821. — Lambert & Dixon, (seal).” The defendant pleaded in abatement the non-joinder of Dixon. The pleas were demurred to, and final judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.
Judah, for the appellant. Tabbs, for the appellee.
The obligation reads, I promise to pay, &c., witness my hand, Sec. The plaintiff had a right to treat this as a several obligation, and institute his action accordingly. He has done so; and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunt v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Haines v. CorlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Giles v. CanaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Groves v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
- Koontz v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Corneille v. PfeifferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901