Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Progreso Independent School District
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 17, 1983No. 2503cvPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that the bond election conducted by the Progreso Independent School District on January 17,1981, was in all. respects proper and valid. We affirm.
The appellants, all residents and taxpayers of the District, sought before the issuance of the bonds to enjoin the issuance of the bonds in an action filed on August 17, 1981. The District then instituted this action for a declaratory judgment and made a motion to consolidate the injunction suit with the declaratory judgment action. The trial court granted the motion.
The appellants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hill v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Honts v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kreipe, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Broyles v. TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- McCurry v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.