Legal Opinion

Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities v. City of Dallas

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 6, 2002No. 05-01-01579-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice FRANCIS.

This appeal involves the issuance and expenditure of $246 million in general obligation bonds approved by City of Dallas (“City”) voters to develop the Trinity River Corridor Project. Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities and ten citizens challenge the trial court’s summary judgment in the City’s favor, arguing fact issues exist on whether the City has breached its contract with voters by making various changes to the project.

We must decide whether (1) the contract is the bond proposition itself or whether the contract also includes extraneous documents printed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Black v. Victoria Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Scarbrough v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. City of San Antonio v. Headwaters Coalition, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Putnam v. City of Irving, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Ex Parte the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API