Legal Opinion

Haines v. Lamb

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1962No. Civ. 25784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a change of place of trial from Los Angeles to Santa Clara County. This appeal was taken prior to the 1961 amendment to Code of Civil Procedure, section 963, under which such orders are no longer appealable.

The verified complaint is in four counts. The first alleges in substance as follows: After the death of plaintiff’s wife in 1942, plaintiff’s mother-in-law, Perla Davidson, adopted plaintiff’s daughter, the defendant Sally Ann Haines Lamb. In 1943 plaintiff transferred certain property to Perla Davidson in trust for the support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McClung v. WattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Penobscot Area Housing Development Corp. v. City of BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Atkins Pickle Co., Inc. v. Burrough-Uerling-Brasuell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Metzger v. SilvermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Metzger v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API