Legal Opinion

Rupf v. Yan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 2000No. A089051PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Introduction

Welfare and Institutions Code section 8102 authorizes the confiscation and possible forfeiture of firearms or other deadly weapons from persons taken into custody for evaluation of their mental condition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150. 1

Appellant Alexander Almelia Yan challenges the constitutionality of section 8102 on its face and as applied to him. He argues there is no relation between the legislative intent behind the statute and its application and that it is vague and overbroad. He further argues that the court erred in admitting hearsay…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Major v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Fariba v. Dealer Services Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API