Legal Opinion
United States v. Articles of Drug . . . Wans
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided July 13, 1981No. Civ. 80-2112PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
This is a civil in rem seizure action arising under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“Act”), 21 U.S.C. 301 et seq. The complaint alleges that the articles proceeded against, WANS suppositories and their components, are “new drugs” within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 321(p), which may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce under 21 U.S.C. 355(a), since they have not been approved for marketing pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(b). The complaint also alleges that the seized articles are misbranded, while held for sale…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- United States v. An Article of Device "Theramatic," Etc., and Ralph B. Cloward, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. 789 Cases, More or LessDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- United States v. An Article of Food, Etc., Coco Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985