Burr v. Winnett Times Publishing Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers
This is an action for alleged libel per se. No special damages .are alleged. It is agreed by counsel for each side that the alleged libels must be libels per se or plaintiff cannot recover. Counsel for plaintiff (appellant), in their brief, say: “We submit this matter to this court upon the proposition that the publications complained of are libelous per se and, if this court does not agree with us in this respect, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.”
Plaintiff was a farmer and a member and the chairman of the board of county commissioners of Petroleum county. He was a candidate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paxton v. WoodwardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Wofford v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Manley v. HarerMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Brown v. Independent Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
- Cooper v. RomneyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McConkey v. Flathead Electric CooperativeMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Keller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Dillard v. ShattuckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
- LaGrange Press v. Citizen Publishing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.