Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Dougal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 4, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*782Claimant was hired as a temporary seasonal inspector for the Department of Health. After working for the employer for two weeks, claimant resigned via voice mail message indicating that the commute was too far. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The Board also found that claimant was not totally unemployed for the period June 29, 2009 through July 5, 2009 and he had made a willful misstatement on his benefits application regarding that period.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of MannettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of RadulescuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of LignosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Brown (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Brown (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017