Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Radulescu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, employed as a shipping supervisor, resigned from her employment after she lost her ride to work because she believed the lengthy commute involved in using public transportation was unduly onerous. Substantial evidence sup*722ports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EppsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of HaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DougalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re the Claim of MallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API