Legal Opinion

Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

By a libel filed January 30, 1959, libel-ant seeks to recover $30,169, withheld from it by agencies of the United States Government. Presently before the court is respondent’s exception to the libel which seeks its dismissal on the ground that it was not timely filed on January 30, 1959.

The period of limitations under both the Suits in Admiralty Act, 41 Stat. 525, 46 U.S'.C.A. § 745, and the Public Vessels Act, 43 Stat. 1112, 46 U.S.C.A. § 782 is two years. See Phalen v. United States, 2 Cir., 1929, 32 F.2d 687.

The question is: When did the libel-ant’s claim arise for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ally & Gargano, Inc. v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Lankler Siffert & Wohl, LLP v. RossiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber ProductsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API