Legal Opinion

Fresh Start Academy v. Toledo Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 4, 2005No. 3:05 CV 7006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12). Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. No. 16). Defendant has filed a reply (Doc. No. 17). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted.

Background

Plaintiff Fresh Start Academy (“Fresh Start”) is a private provider of educational and tutoring services. Fresh Start would like to provide tutoring services to Toledo Public Schools students in exchange for funds made available to Defendant Toledo Board of Education (“the Board”) under the No Child Left…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alliance for Children, Inc. v. City of Detroit Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. Newark Parents Ass'n v. Newark Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Newark Parents Assn v. Newark Pub SchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API