Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Utilities Corp. v. Delaware Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 31, 1997No. C.A. 96A-01-002-WTQPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Must the Delaware Public Service Commission allow a public natural gas utility company to recover, as a consequence of complying with federally-mandated environmental remediation, the entire cost of compliance, specifically including the carrying costs on the unamortized balance of the remediation expenditure recovery? This is the underlying question in issue on this appeal by the Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (“Chesapeake” or “Company”) following the findings and order of the Delaware Public Service Commission (“Commission” or “DPSC”) below. The question…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  5. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porter v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Porter v. SC PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. N.M. Att'y. Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  4. New Mexico Attorney General v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  5. .M. Att'y. Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API